Israel Abrahams, one of the most distinguished of modern scholars of Judaism in the English-speaking countries, was born in London in 1858, the son of a rabbi who had come to England from Warsaw at an early age. Abrahams was educated at Jews’ College and London University and taught at the former institution from 1881 to 1902, when he left to succeed Solomon Schechter as reader in rabbinics at Cambridge. He remained at Cambridge until his death in 1925.
Abrahams led the life of a scholar. He was active in the founding and administration of Jewish learned societies, presided over university theological societies, and from 1888 to 1908 was joint editor of the Jewish Quarterly Review. He wrote numerous essays, scholarly papers, and books, of which the most important is Jewish Life in the Middle Ages (London, 1896).
In religion, Abrahams was on the side of Reform. Though he opposed political Zionism, he looked to Palestine as a Jewish cultural center and was an ardent believer in the enduring value of the Hebrew language.
The essay reprinted below, an excellent sample of Abrahams’ urbane scholarship, is taken from The Book of Delight and Other Papers, published in 1912 by the Jewish Publication Society of America, by whose permission it appears here. (Another essay from that volume, “Medieval Wayfaring,” was published in this department in the July 1947 issue of COMMENTARY.)—Ed.
_____________
“The Omnipresent,” said a Rabbi, “is occupied in making marriages.” The levity of the saying lies in the ear of him who hears it; for by marriages the speaker meant all the wondrous combinations of the universe, whose issue makes our good and evil.
—George Eliot
The proverb that I have set at the head of these lines is popular in every language of Europe. Need I add that a variant may be found in Chinese? The Old Man of the Moon unites male and female with a silken, invisible thread, and they cannot afterwards be separated, but are destined to become man and wife. The remark of the rabbi quoted in Daniel Deronda carried the proverb back apparently to a Jewish origin; and it is, indeed, more than probable that the rabbinical literature is the earliest source to which this piece of folk philosophy can be traced.
George Eliot’s rabbi was Jose bar Chalafta, and his remark was made to a lady, possibly a Roman matron of high quality, in Sepphoris. Rabbi Jose was evidently an adept in meeting the puzzling questions of women, for as many as sixteen interviews between him and “matrons” are recorded in Aggadic literature. Whether because prophetic of its subsequent popularity, or for some other reason, this particular dialogue in which Rabbi Jose bore so conspicuous a part is repeated in the Midrash Rabba alone not less than four times, besides appearing in other Midrashim. It will be as well, then, to reproduce the passage in a summarized form, for it may be fairly described as the locus classicus on the subject.
“‘How long,’ she asked, ‘did it take God to create the world?’ and Rabbi Jose informed her that the time occupied was six days. ‘What has God been doing since that time?’ continued the matron. ‘The Holy One,’ answered the Rabbi, ‘has been sitting in Heaven arranging marriages.’—‘Indeed!’ she replied, ‘I could do as much myself. I have thousands of slaves, and could marry them off in couples in a single hour. It is easy enough.’—‘I hope that you will find it so,’ said Rabbi Jose. ‘In Heaven it is thought as difficult as the dividing of the Red Sea.’ He then took his departure, while she assembled one thousand men-servants and as many maid-servants, and, marking them off in pairs, ordered them all to marry. On the day following this wholesale wedding, the poor victims came to their mistress in a woeful plight. One had a broken leg, another a black eye, a third a swollen nose; all were suffering from some ailment, but with one voice they joined in the cry, ‘Lady, unmarry us again!’ Then the matron sent for Rabbi Jose, admitted that she had underrated the delicacy and difficulty of matchmaking, and wisely resolved to leave Heaven for the future to do its work in its own way.”
The moral conveyed by this story may seem, however, to have been idealized by George Eliot almost out of recognition. This is hardly the case. Genius penetrates into the heart, even from a casual glance at the face of things. Though it is unlikely that she had ever seen the full passages in the Midrash to which she was alluding, yet her insight was not at fault. For the saying that God is occupied in making marriages is, in fact, associated in some passages of the Midrash with the far wider problems of man’s destiny, with the universal effort to explain the inequalities of fortune, and the changes with which the future is heavy.
Rabbi Jose’s proverbial explanation of connubial happiness was not merely a bon mot invented on the spur of the moment, to silence an awkward questioner. It was a firm conviction, which finds expression in more than one quaint utterance, but also in more than one matter-of-fact assertion. To take the latter first:
Rabbi Phineas in the name of Rabbi Abbahu said, We find in the Torah, in the Prophets, and in the Holy Writings, evidence that a man’s wife is chosen for him by the Holy One, blessed be He. Whence do we deduce it in the Torah? From Genesis 24:50: ‘Then Laban and Bethuel answered and said [in reference to Rebekah’s betrothal to Isaac]: The thing proceedeth from the Lord.’ In the Prophets it is found in Judges 14:4 [where it is related how Samson wishes to mate himself with a woman in Timnath, of the daughters of the Philistines]: ‘But his father and mother knew not that it was of the Lord.’ In the Holy Writings the same may be seen, for it is written [Proverbs 19:14]: ‘House and riches are the inheritance of fathers, but a prudent wife is from the Lord.’
Another text that might be appealed to is Tobit 6:18. The Angel encourages Tobit to marry Sarah, though her seven husbands, one after the other, had died on their wedding eves. “Fear not,” said Raphael, “for she is appointed unto thee from the beginning.”
_____________
Here we may, for a moment, pause to consider whether any parallels to the belief in Heaven-made marriages exist in other ancient literatures. It appears in English as early as Shakespeare:
God, the best maker of all marriages,
Combine your hearts in one.Henry V., v. 2.
This, however, is too late to throw any light on its origin. With a little ingenuity, one might, perhaps, torture some such notion out of certain fantastic sentences of Plato. In the Symposium (par. 192), however, God is represented as putting obstacles in the way of the union of fitting lovers, in consequence of the wickedness of mankind. When men become, by their conduct, reconciled with God, they may find their true loves. Astrological divinations on the subject are certainly common enough in Eastern stories; a remarkable instance will be given later on. At the present day, Lane tells us, the numerical value of the letters in the names of the two parties to the contract are added for each name separately, and one of the totals is subtracted from the other. If the remainder is uneven, the inference drawn is favorable; but if even, the reverse. The pursuit of gematria [Cabalistic word cryptographs] is apparently not limited to Jews. Such methods, however, hardly illustrate my present point, for the identity of the couple is not discovered by the process. Whether the diviner’s object is to make this discovery, or the future lot of the married pair is all that he seeks to reveal, in both cases, though he charm never so wisely, it does not fall within the scope of this inquiry. Without stretching one’s imagination too much, some passages in the Panchatantra seem to imply a belief that marriage-making is under the direct control of Providence. Take, for instance, the story of the beautiful princess who was betrothed to a serpent, Deva Serma’s son. Despite the various attempts made to induce her to break off so hideous a match, she declines steadfastly to go back from her word, and bases her refusal on the ground that the marriage was inevitable and destined by the gods.
As quaint illustrations may be instanced the following: “Raba heard a certain man praying that he might marry a certain damsel; Raba rebuked him with the words: ‘If she be destined for thee, nothing will part thee from her; if thou art not destined for her, thou art denying Providence in praying for her.’ Afterwards Raba heard him say, ‘If I am not destined to marry her, I hope that either I or she may die,’” meaning that he could not bear to witness her union with another. Despite Raba’s protest, other instances are on record of prayers similar to the one of which he disapproved. Or, again, the Midrash offers a curious illustration of Psalm 62:10, “Surely men of low degree are a breath, and men of high degree a lie.” The first clause of the verse alludes to those who say in the usual way of the world, that a certain man is about to wed a certain maiden. In both cases people are in error in thinking that the various parties are acting entirely of their own free will; as a matter of fact, the whole affair is predestined. I am not quite certain whether the same idea is intended by the Yalkut Reubeni, in which the following occurs: “Know that all religious and pious men in this our generation are henpecked by their wives, the reason being connected with the mystery of the Golden Calf. The men on that occasion did not protest against the action of the mixed multitude [at whose door the charge of making the calf is laid], while the women were unwilling to surrender their golden ornaments for idolatrous purposes. Therefore they rule over their husbands.” One might also quote the bearing of the mystical theory of transmigration on the predestination of bridal pairs. In the Talmud, on the other hand, the virtues of a man’s wife are sometimes said to be in proportion to the husband’s own; or in other words, his own righteousness is the cause of his acquiring a good wife. The obvious objection, raised by the Talmud itself, is that a man’s merits can hardly be displayed before his birth—and yet his bride is destined for him at that early period.
Yet more quaint (I should perhaps rather term it consistent, were not consistency rare enough to be indistinguishable from quaintness) was the confident belief of a maiden of whom mention is made in the Sefer ha-Hasidim (par. 384). She refused persistently to deck her person with ornaments. People said to her, “If you go about thus unadorned, no one will notice you nor court you.” She replied with firm simplicity, “It is the Holy One, blessed be He, that settles marriages; I need have no concern on the point myself.” Virtue was duly rewarded, for she married a learned and pious husband. This passage in the “Book of the Pious” reminds me of the circumstance under which the originator of the latter-day Hasidism, Israel Baal-Shem, is said to have married. When he was offered the daughter of a rich and learned man of Brody, named Abraham, he readily accepted the alliance, because he knew that Abraham’s daughter was his bride destined by Heaven. For, like Moses Mendelssohn, in some other respects the antagonist of the Hasidim, Baal-Shem accepted the declaration of Rabbi Judah in the name of Rab: “Forty days before the creation of a girl, a proclamation [bat-kol] is made in Heaven, saying, ‘The daughter of such a one shall marry such and such a one.’”
_____________
The belief in the Divine ordaining of marriages affected the medieval synagogue liturgy. To repeat what I have written elsewhere: When the bridegroom, with a joyous retinue, visited the synagogue on the Sabbath following his marriage, the congregation chanted the chapter of Genesis (24) that narrates the story of Isaac’s marriage, which, as Abraham’s servant claimed, was providentially arranged. This chapter was sung not only in Hebrew but in Arabic, in countries where the latter language was the vernacular. These special readings, which were additional to the regular Scripture lesson, seem to have fallen out of use in Europe in the 17th century, but they are still retained in the East. But all over Jewry the beautiful old belief is contained in the wording of the fourth of the “seven benedictions” sung at the celebration of a wedding, “Blessed art thou, O Lord our God, King of the Universe, who hast made man in thine image, after thy likeness, and has prepared unto him out of his very self a perpetual fabric.” Here is recalled the creation of Eve, of whom God Himself said, “I will make for man a help meet unto him.” Not only the marriage, but also the bride was Heaven-made, and the wonderful wedding benediction enshrines this idea.
In an Aggadic story, the force of this predestination is shown to be too strong even for royal opposition. It does not follow that the pre-arrangement of marriages implies that the pair cannot fall in love of their own accord. On the contrary, just the right two eventually come together; for once free will and destiny need present no incompatibility. The combination, here shadowed, of a predestined and yet true-love marriage, is effectively illustrated in what follows:
Solomon the king was blessed with a very beautiful daughter; she was the fairest maiden in the whole land of Israel. Her father observed the stars, to discover by astrology who was destined to be her mate in life and wed her, when lo! he saw that his future son-in-law would be the poorest man in the nation. Now, what did Solomon do? He built a high tower by the sea, and surrounded it on all sides with inaccessible walls; he then took his daughter and placed her in the tower under the charge of seventy aged guardians. He supplied the castle with provisions, but he had no door made in it, so that none could enter the fortress without the knowledge of the guard. Then the king said, ‘I will watch in what way God will work the matter.
In course of time, a poor and weary traveler was walking on his way by night, his garments were ragged and torn, he was barefooted and ready to faint with hunger, cold, and fatigue. He knew not where to sleep, but, casting his eyes around him, he beheld the skeleton of an ox lying on a field hard by. The youth crept inside the skeleton to shelter himself from the wind, and, while he slept there, down swooped a great bird, which lifted up the carcass and the unconscious youth in it. The bird flew with its burden to the top of Solomon’s tower, and set it down on the roof before the very door of the imprisoned princess. She went forth on the morrow to walk on the roof according to her daily wont, and she descried the youth. She said to him, ‘Who art thou? and who brought thee hither?’ He answered, ‘I am a Jew of Acco, and a bird bore me to thee.’ The kindhearted maiden clothed him in new garments; they bathed and anointed him, and she saw that he was the handsomest youth in Israel. They loved one another, and his soul was bound up in hers. One day she said, ‘Wilt thou marry me?’ He replied, ‘Would it might be so!’ They resolved to marry. But there was no ink with which to write the ketubah, or marriage certificate. Love laughs at obstacles. So, using some drops of his own blood as ink, the marriage was secretly solemnized, and he said, ‘God is my witness today, and Michael and Gabriel likewise.’ When the matter leaked out, the dismayed custodians of the princess hastily summoned Solomon. The king at once obeyed their call, and asked for the presumptuous youth. He looked at his son-in-law, inquired of him as to his father and mother, family and dwelling-place, and from his replies the king recognized him for the selfsame man whom he had seen in the stars as the destined husband of his daughter. Then Solomon rejoiced with exceeding joy and exclaimed, Blessed is the Omnipresent who giveth a wife to man and establisheth him in his house.
The moral of which seems to be that, though marriages are made in Heaven, love must be made on earth.
_____________