To the Editor: My contention against Dr. Lynd is that in her discussion of the University of Washington cases she departed from accepted canons of scholarship. Her rejoinder does not refute the contention. The issue is not Mr. Canwell, for whom I hold no brief whatsoever. Nor is it the...

Continue Reading

Subscribe to Commentary Magazine for unlimited access to this article and our complete 75-year archive.

📚
Complete 75-year archive access
📱
Ad-free reading experience
📖
Monthly print magazine
💎
Exclusive subscriber content

PRINT + DIGITAL (annual)

$ 108 /year
Save 10%
  • ✓ Every article, blog post & podcast, unlocked
  • ✓ Access to all past issues since 1945
  • ✓ Access to our curated iPad app
  • ✓ PDF download of current issue
  • ✓ Monthly print edition delivered to your door
  • ✓ You can cancel anytime

PRINT + DIGITAL (monthly)

$ 9.97 /month
  • ✓ Every article, blog post & podcast, unlocked
  • ✓ Access to all past issues since 1945
  • ✓ Access to our curated iPad app
  • ✓ PDF download of current issue
  • ✓ Monthly print edition delivered to your door
  • ✓ You can cancel anytime

DIGITAL (annual)

$ 86 /year
Save 10%
  • ✓ Everything but the print edition

DIGITAL (monthly)

$ 7.97 /month
  • ✓ Everything but the print edition

Join thousands of readers who trust Commentary Magazine for intelligent analysis and thoughtful discussion.

+ A A -
Share via
Copy link