Well, John, I look forward to learning how the sinister Jews conned the eighty-seven Chinese dissidents into joining the plot.

From the start, the critics of Chas Freeman contended that he was controlled by bias and plauged by venom, that he lacked analytical skills needed for a national security post, and that he did not offer intellectual “balance” but quackery. Could there be any better proof than Freeman’s rant?

But there is something even more troubling here. While blowing up his own reputation, Freeman has also shattered the reputation of those who hired him. How could they not have perceived his character and intellectual bent? The lapse of judgment in placing him in a key intelligence role is simply appalling. What say you, National Intelligence Director Blair?